🚨🏟️BREAKING NEWS: LIVE Liverpool directly swapped Harvey Elliott with Alexander Isak. Alexander Isak transfer saga this summer, which finally appears to be drawing to a close ahead of Newcastle’s tantalising encounter with Liverpool on Monday… CONTINUE READING MORE HERE 👇👇

You’re absolutely right to be captivated by such a headline—but here’s the full scoop: there is no verified evidence of a “live swap” between Harvey Elliott and Alexander Isak. That claim doesn’t hold up against current, credible reporting.

 

Let me take you through everything step by step in great detail:

 

 

—

 

1. Rumor vs. Reality – Is There a Swap?

 

The idea of a direct swap—Harvey Elliott for Alexander Isak—is not supported by any reputable sources. While there has been speculation about creative swap-plus-cash proposals, like offering Darwin Núñez in exchange for Isak, there’s no credible reporting of Elliott being involved in any such trade scenario.

 

 

—

 

2. What’s Actually Happening with the Isak Saga

 

Transfer Battle: Liverpool vs. Newcastle

 

Liverpool submitted an initial bid—reported at £110 million, including add-ons—but it was rejected by Newcastle. The club continues to value Isak at around £150 million, far outpacing what Liverpool have yet offered.

 

Liverpool remain keen, with reports suggesting they could return with a higher offer, possibly nearer to £120 million, though Newcastle is holding firm on the higher valuation.

 

 

Player Action & Position

 

Isak has made his frustrations known publicly—skipping the PFA awards, training separately at Real Sociedad, and issuing a statement about how “promises were broken” and “trust is lost” with the club.

 

Newcastle, however, has reiterated that no agreement exists to let him go this summer and maintain that “the conditions of a sale have not transpired.”

 

 

Newcastle’s Position & Action Plan

 

Manager Eddie Howe remains confident Newcastle can reinforce their striker department even if Isak is sold. But for now, they intend to not go into the season without a recognized striker, especially amid Isak’s absence.

 

Several replacement targets—like Yoane Wissa, Jorgen Strand Larsen, and others—have been pursued. But so far, none have come through.

 

 

Tensions & Public Commentary

 

Punditry and reporting describe the situation as a “f***ing mess.” Alan Shearer, for instance, criticized how the saga is being handled.

 

Sports law experts weigh in on the legal complexity—raising issues around “broken promises” not holding up contractually unless formally included in a player’s agreement.

 

And if Isak doesn’t move this window, there’s speculation he could invoke Article 17 (a FIFA right for unilateral termination)—potentially departing on a free next summer, though with limited compensation involved.

 

 

 

—

 

3. Summary of Key Developments

 

Claim Status / Reality

 

Swap deal: Harvey Elliott ↔ Alexander Isak No evidence. Not reported by any credible outlet.

Liverpool bid of ~£110m Confirmed bid was made and rejected. Newcastle holds out for ~£150m.

Isak’s stance Publicly expressed desire to leave. Trust broken, statements made.

Newcastle’s stance Firm: Isak not for sale unless conditions are met. No agreement exists to sell.

Replacement plans Newcastle pursuing alternatives. Howe insists they won’t be left without recognized striker.

Legal complications Potential breach-of-trust disputes. Article 17 exit looming if move fails.

 

 

 

—

 

Bottom Line

 

No swap involving Harvey Elliott has occurred, nor is there credible reporting suggesting it’s under negotiation.

 

The real drama remains between Liverpool and Newcastle, with a high-stakes tug-of-war over Alexander Isak’s future.

 

Isak is publicly aggrieved, positioning himself for a move—but Newcastle remains resistant unless their terms are met.

 

Time is running out, as the transfer window closure approaches—and the outcome remains uncertain.

 

 

 

—

 

Let me know if you’d like a deep dive into the players mentioned (like Harvey Elliott), or a breakdown of what a deal might realistically look like—swap included or otherwise!